Defense Litigation Insider Helping you navigate a clear path through complex litigation.

Peter Faben

Posts by Peter Faben

Free and Clear: Dissolved Delaware Corporation Deemed Not Liable for Asbestos-Related Liabilities More than 10 Years After Dissolution

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Delaware Courts

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently took a rare foray into the world of asbestos litigation after it was asked to appoint a receiver to distribute the remaining reserves from casualty insurance policies issued to Krafft-Murphy Company, Inc. (“Krafft-Murphy”) to plaintiffs who allege injury from asbestos-containing products used by Krafft-Murphy.  The Chancery Court, in an… Continue Reading

Verdict Alert: Delaware jury awards $2.8 million to surviving wife and estate of a 62 year-old deceased man with mesothelioma in a talc case.

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Delaware Courts

On July 27, 2012, a jury in the matter of Michael Galliher v. American Optical Corp., et al., an asbestos personal injury lawsuit pending in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, awarded over $2.8 million to the surviving wife and the estate of Michael Galliher.  The jury found the sole defendant at trial,… Continue Reading

John Crane v. Hardick: No Non-Pecuniary Damages for the Estate of a Former Navy Sailor

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Delaware Courts

  As has been discussed on this blog, a number of Courts—including the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the DE Maritime—have recently held that maritime law may apply to claims brought by former Navy sailors who allege exposure to asbestos while performing maintenance work on ships while at sea.  Now, the Supreme Court of Virginia,… Continue Reading

Philadelphia Judge Addresses Criticisms of Court’s Asbestos Program

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Litigation Trends

Co-authored by Brian Gross  This week, the Honorable John W. Herron, the Administrative Judge of the Trial Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, issued a significant order that attempts to address perceived problems in the Court’s Mass Tort and Asbestos Programs.  The order, available here, enumerates 15 different reforms that will significantly change… Continue Reading

‘Twas the Night Before Trial – Bankruptcy Claims Forms and the Danger of Non-Disclosure

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Delaware Courts, Litigation Trends

Co-authored by Brian Gross  Filing claims with asbestos personal injury bankruptcy trusts is a double-edged sword for plaintiffs.  While plaintiffs (particularly those diagnosed with mesothelioma) can recover hundreds of thousands of dollars from such trusts, bankruptcy claims and the forms associated with those claims can have a significant effect on a plaintiff’s legal action.  Not only… Continue Reading

MDL-857 Update

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Litigation Trends

Co-authored by Brian Gross UPDATE: On December 13, 2012, the MDL Panel issued an order in which it adopted Judge Robreno’s Suggestion.  Please note, however, that the MDL Panel ordered that tag-along asbestos cases (subject to the five exceptions enumerated in Judge Robreno’s Suggestion) no longer be transferred to MDL-875 effective immediately – not starting January… Continue Reading

Death Knell for MDL-875? Judge Robreno Suggests to the MDL Panel that it Stop Transferring “Tag-Along” Asbestos Cases

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Litigation Trends

Co-authored by Brian Gross On November 23, 2011, Judge Eduardo Robreno of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the judge who oversees the federal multidistrict asbestos litigation docket (MDL-875), filed a Suggestion to the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“the Panel”) Concerning Future Tag-Along Transfers.  After noting that the backlog of cases… Continue Reading

Judge’s Decision Brings Much Needed Clarity On The Issue of Maritime Jurisdiction in Asbestos Exposure Cases.

Posted in Asbestos Litigation, Toxic Tort

Co-authored by Brian Gross Choice of law analyses can, at times, be complicated affairs.  That is particularly true in asbestos cases in which a plaintiff alleges exposure to numerous asbestos-containing products in multiple states over a prolonged period of years.  An additional layer of complexity is added when some or all of the plaintiff’s allegations relate… Continue Reading